Disposed¶22

Manoharan v. Eanthadimuthu

Madras HC1 Jul 2025CRP(MD)/1155/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expedition/expeditious hearing of execution application; direction to trial court to dispose within fixed time limit (six months); Article 227 supervisory power over subordinate court delay; Sub Court Tuticorin; E.A.No.27 of 2018; E.P.No.38 of 2014; O.S.No.343 of 2011; decree execution pending since 2018; decided without going into merits; no costs; single-judge order dated 01.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned Sub Judge, Tuticorin to conclude the proceedings in E.A.No.27 of 2018 in E.P.No.38 of 2014 in O.S.No.343 of 2011 within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, if not already disposed of; Civil Revision Petition disposed of, no costs. ¶22

Manoharan Vs Eanthadimuthu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1155 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 01.07.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1155 of 2022

Manoharan

...Petitioner

Vs.

Eanthadimuthu ...Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the learned Sub Judge, Tuticorin to expeditiously hear the execution application in E.A.No.27 of 2018 in E.P.No.38 of 2014 in O.S.No. 343 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Tuticorin and allow this Civil Revision Petition.

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the learned Sub Judge, Tuticorin to expeditiously hear the execution application in E.A.No.27 of 2018 in E.P.No.38 of 2014 in O.S.No.343 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Tuticorin.

¶14

The petitioner herein filed an execution application in E.A.No.27 of 2018 in E.P.No.38 of 2014 in O.S.No.343 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court,

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1155 of 2022

¶18

Tuticorin. However, the same has not been disposed of till date. Hence, the petitioner has filed this present Civil Revision Petition.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that

¶20

this Court may issue a direction to the trial Court to expeditiously hear the execution application in E.A.No.27 of 2018 in E.P.No.38 of 2014 in O.S.No. 343 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Curt, Tuticorin.

¶21

In such view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that without going into the merits of the case, it would be suffice to issue a direction to the learned Sub Judge, Tuticorin, to conclude the proceedings in E.A.No.27 of 2018 in E.P.No.38 of 2014 in O.S.No.343 of 2011 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the application has not already been disposed of.

¶22