T.M.M.A. Mohammed Thameem v. S.F. Saleema Begum
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition listed for mentioning; petitioner reported paying admitted arrears and handing over keys to respondent, who confirmed. Court recorded compliance and made no further orders.
What did the court decide?
No further orders required
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP.No.977 of 2025
P.B.BALAJI, J.
The matter is today listed under the caption “For Being Mentioned”.
- The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has paid the admitted arrears as directed by this Court and also handed over the key to the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
- The learned counsel for the respondent
also affirms the representation of the respondent.
- In view of the same, no further orders are required.
26.02.2026
pvs
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
petitioner
- respondent
respondent
Coram
P.B.Balaji
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court