Dismissed¶¶37

M.Malathy v. Mrs.Sangamithirai

Madras HC25 Apr 2025CRP/923/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRP No. 923 of 2025; Madras High Court; A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.; 25.04.2025; Article 227 of the Constitution of India; Civil Revision Petition; RLTOP.Sr.9218 of 2024; X Small Causes Court, Chennai; rejection order 04.02.2025; dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to represent RLTOP petition; no costs; Padmavathy vs. Amudha Pearls C.R.P.No.2766 of 2022 order dated 11.03.2024; C.R.P.Nos.3985 of 2020 and etc. batch dated 23.04.2024; M.Malathy; S.Pratap power of attorney; Sangamithirai; N.Elayaraja; R.S.Mangalakumar.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to represent the RLTOP petition before the X Small Causes Court, Chennai; no costs. ¶¶37

M.Malathy Vs Mrs.Sangamithirai — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRP No. 923 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 25.04.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

CRP No. 923 of 2025

¶7

M.Malathy

¶8

Rep. by her Power of Attorney S.Pratap

....... Petitioner

Sangamithirai

....... Respondent

Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the rejection order passed in RLTOP.Sr.9218 of 2024 by the X Small Causes Court, Chennai on 04.02.2025 and consequently direct the trial Court to number the case and decide the same on merits in accordance with law.

¶14

For Petitioner: Mr.N.Elayaraja

¶15

For Respondent: Mr .R.S.Mangalakumar

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This petition has been filed seeking to set aside the rejection order

¶18

passed in RLTOP.Sr.9218 of 2024 by the X Small Causes Court, Chennai on

¶19

Page No:1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

CRP No. 923 of 2025

¶22

04.02.2025 and consequently direct the trial Court to number the case and

¶23

decide the same on merits in accordance with law.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Rent Controller

¶25

by following the judgment in the case of Padmavathy vs. Amudha Pearls in C.R.P.No.2766 of 2022 vide order dated 11.03.2024, had earlier returned the

¶26

petition as not maintainable. Subsequently, the same Court in similar cases, taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in C.R.P.Nos.3985 of 2020

¶27

and etc., batch dated 23.04.2024 ordered to number such similar applications.

¶28

Thereby, the learned counsel for the petitioner requested that this petition may

¶29

be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to represent the RLTOP petition before

¶30

the X Small Causes Court, Chennai. He also made an endorsement to that

¶31

effect.

¶32

3.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the