Petitioners sought a time-bound direction to the NCLT to decide interlocutory applications in a liquidation matter, citing the first petitioner's age of 86. The Court declined to fix a timeline but requested expeditious disposal and disposed of the revisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:MHC:2955
CRP No. 6396 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
CRP No. 6396 of 2025 AND CRP NO. 6400 OF 2025
Petitioner(s) in both petitions
Vs
Respondent(s) in both petitions
1 / 5
CRP No. 6396 of 2025
CRP No. 6396 of 2025
PRAYER
To set aside the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal Division Bench, Court -II, in IA(I.B.C) no.1897 (CHE) of 2025 in IA.No.1372 of 2025 in IBA 1423 of 2019 dated 25-11-2025.
CRP No. 6400 of 2025
PRAYER
To set aside the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal Division Bench, Court -II, in IA(I.B.C) No.1896 (CHE) of 2025 in I.A.No.1160 of 2025 in IBA 1423 of 2019 dated 25-11-2025.
CRP No. 6396 of 2025
For Petitioner(s): Mr.Nithaesh Natraj for Mr.Vaibhav Rangarajan Venkatesh
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Civil Revision Petitions are filed to set aside the orders passed by the
National Company Law Tribunal Division Bench, Court -II, in IA(I.B.C) no.1897 (CHE) of 2025 in IA.No.1372 of 2025 and IA(I.B.C) No.1896 (CHE) of 2025 in I.A.No.1160 of 2025 in IBA 1423 of 2019 dated 25.11.2025.
2 / 5
CRP No. 6396 of 2025
some attention. However, this Court is conscious that a mere direction to dispose of petition by fixing a time limit would equally cause some inconvenience to the Presiding Officer, and every Court is expected to consider the matters on its Board, considering the nature of urgency and by giving priority to senior citizens like that of the petitioner, who is now aged about 86 years and all other mitigating factors and circumstances. Therefore, blanket direction issued by the Courts fixing time line to dispose of the cases would do no service to the cause of justice, but may result in causing inconvenience to the Court concerned. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners and also considering the age of the senior citizen in the present case, this Court requests the NCLT to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible.
No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.
(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(C.KUMARAPPAN J.) 12-12-2025
gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No
3 / 5
CRP No. 6396 of 2025
To
1.Ebenezar Inbaraj The Liquidator For Landmark Housing Projects Chennai Private Limited, Reg No IBBI/PA-001/IP/-P00754/20172018/11286/397, Precision Plaza, No 23, Third Floor, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.
4 / 5
CRP No. 6396 of 2025
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN J.
gd
CRP No. 6396 of 2025 AND CRP NO. 6400 OF 2025
12-12-2025
5 / 5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the NCLT to dispose of pending interlocutory applications expeditiously, given that the first petitioner is an 86-year-old senior citizen.
Savithri Naidu
Rajiv Naidu
Vikram Naidu
M/s. Match Point Tennis Academy rep. by its Managing Director Mr. Rajiv Naidu
Ebenezar Inbaraj, Liquidator for Landmark Housing Projects Chennai Private Limited
S. M. Subramaniam
C. Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
