Defendants challenged an ad-interim injunction granted to the plaintiff in a suit for permanent injunction over suit property, arguing the sale deed was obtained by fraud. The High Court found both courts below had correctly found a prima facie case of plaintiff's possession and declined to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP.No.4476 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.22825 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN
CRP.No.4476 of 2025
and CMP.No.22825 of 2025
Defendants 1 to 4
Versus
... 1st Respondent / 1st Respondent / Plaintiff
... 2nd Respondent / 2nd Respondent /
5th Defendant
Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in CMA. No. 7 of 2025 on the file of the XVI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 15.04.2025 and confirming the fair and Decreetal order passed in I.A.No.2 of 2024 in O.S.No.2863 of 2024, dated 13.02.2025 on the file of the II Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and allow the Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioners : Mr. R.Suryaprakash
1/6
CRP.No.4476 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.22825 of 2025
O R D E R
Unsuccessful defendants 1 to 4 have preferred the present Civil Revision Petition.
2/6
CRP.No.4476 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.22825 of 2025
3/6
CRP.No.4476 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.22825 of 2025
found that patta had been issued in 2023, and the property was surveyed and demarcated pursuant to the orders of the High Court dated 06.02.2024 in W.P.No.32776 of 2023. However, the appellants contended that the possession of the property has been with the Thasildar, Perambur, from 27.11.2018 onwards.
4/6
CRP.No.4476 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.22825 of 2025
Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, and in I.A.No.2 of 2024 in
O.S.No.2863 of 2024, dated 13.02.2025, on the file of the II Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
19.09.2025
av Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral Case Citation : Yes/No To 1. The learned XVI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
M. JOTHIRAMAN, J.
av
5/6
CRP.No.4476 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.22825 of 2025
CRP.No.4476 of 2025 and CMP.No.22825 of 2025
19.09.2025
6/6
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court rightly granted an ad-interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff based on a prima facie case and balance of convenience.
Whether the first appellate court's confirmation of the interim injunction order warranted interference under Article 227.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
V.Dhanasekar
Suguna
Thiruvengadam
Umapathy
Arasapan
Sekar
M. Jothiraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
