Dismissed¶26

V. Bhavani v. J.Venkatesan @ Ambeth

Madras HC19 Dec 2025CRP/4021/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous; Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950; Madras High Court; R. Sakthivel J.; C.R.P.No.4021 of 2022; C.M.P.No.20864 of 2022; V. Bhavani v. J.Venkatesan @ Ambeth; Family Judge Thiruvallur; H.M.O.P.No.47 of 2021; I.A.No.3 of 2021; order dated July 13, 2022; main HMOP allowed on merits; Memo dated December 19, 2025 recorded; no representation for petitioner; E. Preetiga; T.R. Udaya Kumar.

What did the court decide?

In view of the respondent's counsel's submission, supported by the Memo dated December 19, 2025, that the main H.M.O.P.No.47 of 2021 had been allowed on merits and the revision prayer had become infructuous, the Court recorded the Memo and dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous. ¶25-26

V. Bhavani Vs J.Venkatesan @ Ambeth — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.R.P.No.4021 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 19-12-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL

¶6

C.R.P.No.4021 of 2022

¶7

and

¶8

C.M.P.No.20864 of 2022

¶9

V. Bhavani

¶10

...Petitioner/Petitioner/Respondent

¶11

¶12

J.Venkatesan @ Ambeth

¶13

...Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner

¶14

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to set aside the Order dated July 13, 2022 passed in I.A.No.3 of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.47 of 2021 on the file of the learned Family Judge, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District and to allow this revision.

¶15

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Ms.E.Preetiga for Mr.T.R.Udaya Kumar

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Ms.E.Preetiga, representing Mr.T.R.Udaya Kumar, learned Counsel on

¶18

record for the Respondent is before this Court. There is no representation for the Revision Petitioner.

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

C.R.P.No.4021 of 2022

¶21

2.Ms.E.Preetiga, representing Mr.T.R.Udaya Kumar, learned Counsel on

¶22

record for the sole Respondent submits that the main H.M.O.P.No.47 of 2021 on

¶23

the file of the learned Family Judge, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District, was allowed on merits. Hence, the prayer sought for in this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. To that effect, she filed a Memo dated December 19, 2025.

¶24

3.The Memo dated December 19, 2025 is recorded.

¶25

4.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for

¶26

the Revision Petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶27

19-12-2025

¶28

mps Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶29

¶30