Dismissed¶23

Sasikumar v. Elumalai

Madras HC12 Dec 2025CRP/3374/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; C.R.P.No.3374 of 2023; C.M.P.No.20980 of 2023; Sasikumar v. Elumalai; Article 227 Constitution of India 1950; civil revision petition; Principal District Judge Tiruvannamalai; O.S.No.90 of 2022; I.A.No.1 of 2022; Order and Decree dated March 24, 2023; suit dismissed as settled out of Court; revision petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; decided 12-12-2025; R. Sakthivel J.

What did the court decide?

Since the underlying suit O.S.No.90 of 2022 had been dismissed as settled out of Court, the relief sought in the Civil Revision Petition had become infructuous; accepting the submission of counsel for the revision petitioner, the Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous. ¶23

Sasikumar Vs Elumalai — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

C.R.P.No.3374 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12-12-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

¶6

C.R.P.No.3374 of 2023 and C.M.P.No .20980 of 2023

¶7

Sasikumar

¶8

...Petitioner/Petitioner/ Plaintiff

¶9

¶10

Elumalai

¶11

...Respondent/ Respondent/Defendant

¶12

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to set aside the Order and Decree dated March 24, 2023 made in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.No.90 of 2022 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai and to allow the same.

¶13

For Petitioner(s): Mr.CH.Mohith Sai

¶14

For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Rajesh for Ms.G.Sumitra

¶15

ORDER

¶16

Mr.CH.Mohith Sai, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner

¶17

and Mr.S.Rajesh, representing Ms.G.Sumitra, learned counsel on record for the respondent are before this Court.

¶18

1/3

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

C.R.P.No.3374 of 2023

¶21

2.The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submits that

¶22

the Original Suit in O.S.No.90 of 2022 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai, was dismissed as settled out of Court. To that effect, the learned counsel has produced a photocopy of the Judgment and Decree. Hence, the prayer sought for in this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.

¶23

3.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶24

12-12-2025

¶25

mps Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶26

¶27

The Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai.

¶28

2/3

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30