Petitioner sought expeditious disposal of an appeal pending since 2014 before the Subordinate Court, Erode in a suit for declaration and mandatory injunction. The High Court directed disposal within three months and allowed the revision petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP No.2883 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated :14.07.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
C.R.P.No.2883 of 2025
C.Senthilkumar
... Petitioner
vs
K.Loganathan .. Respondent
Revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Erode to dispose of A.S.No.95 of 2014 within the time frame fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Adhishree
ORDER
Heard Mr.M.Adhishree, learned counsel for the petitioner.
respondent is dispensed with.
pending on the file of Subordinate Court, Erode. The suit is filed for declaration, mandatory injunction and also for other reliefs. The appeal itself is pending from 2014.
P.B.BALAJI.,J.
1/2
CRP No.2883 of 2025
sr
costs.
14.07.2025
Index: Yes/No Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order sr To
The Subordinate Court, Erode
C.R.P.No.2883 of 2025
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Can the Subordinate Judge, Erode be directed to dispose of A.S.No.95 of 2014, pending since 2014, within a fixed time frame?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Senthilkumar
K.Loganathan
P.B. Balaji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
