Naveenan v. M.Sivasankari
Case brief
What is this about?
Short infructuous-dismissal order. Parties: petitioners Naveenan, Laila, N.Vinoth, Vijayalakshmi (counsel M.Guruprasad for S.Saravanakumar); respondents M.Sivasankari (counsel N. Manoharan for R1) and N.Vijay (no counsel shown). Subject matter: quashing of case in DVC No.3 of 2023 pending before Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham, via CRP under Article 227. Disposition: CRP dismissed as infructuous on report of settlement and disposal of the underlying case; connected C.M.P.Nos.15660 & 15661 of 2023 closed. Bench: S. Sounthar J. (single member). No precedent engaged; only constitutional reference is Article 227.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous because the underlying case in DVC No.3 of 2023 has already been disposed of as the parties settled the matter; consequently, the connected C.M.P.Nos.15660 & 15661 of 2023 stand closed.