Dismissed¶28

B. Ettiyappan v. E. Punitha

Madras HC11 Dec 2025CRP/1905/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as withdrawn; withdrawal of civil revision petition; counsel's endorsement in case file; Article 227 Constitution of India 1950; D.V.C.No.6 of 2022 pending; Additional Mahila Court Chengalpattu; strike off names of petitioners; no order as to costs; connected C.M.Ps. closed; R. Sakthivel J.; Madras High Court; 11.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition was granted; the CRP was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and the connected C.M.P.Nos.12108 & 12109 of 2023 were closed. ¶28

B. Ettiyappan Vs E. Punitha — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated: 11.12.2025

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL

¶5

C.R.P.No.1905 of 2023

¶6

and C.M.P.Nos.12108 & 12109 of 2023

¶7

B.Ettiyappan, No.41, Arasur Village, Opposite to Sri Muthumariyamman Kovil, Cheyyur Taluk, Changalpattu District.

¶8

E.Selvarani, No.41, Arasur Village, Opposite to Sri Muthumariyamman Kovil, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District.

¶9

E.Bakiaraj, No.41, Arasur Village, Opposite to Sri Muthumariyamman Kovil, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District.

¶10

B.Mohana Priya, No.41, Arasur Village, Opposite to Sri Muthumariamman Kovil, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District. … Petitioners/Respondents 2 to 5

¶11

Page No.1 of 4

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

Vs.

¶14

E.Punitha,

¶15

No.31/17, Sunnambukara Street, Chengalpattu Town, Chengalpattu District-603 002. … Respondent/Petitioner

¶16

E.Boopathi,

¶17

No.41, Arasur Village, Opposite to Sri Muthumariyamman Kovil, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District. … Respondent/1st Respondent

¶18

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to call for the records pertaining to D.V.C.No.6 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court at Chengalpattu and strike off the name of the Petitioners by allowing the Civil Revision Petition.

¶19

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Balamurugan For Respondents : Served. No appearance.

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Mr.A.Balamurugan, learned Counsel on record for the Revision

¶22

Petitioners is before this Court.

¶23

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioners seeks

¶24

permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case file.

¶25

Page No.2 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

3 . The scanned version of the endorsement is reproduced below:

¶28

4. In view of the above submission and endorsement made, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶29

Page No.3 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

R. SAKTHIVEL, J.

¶32

kmm

¶33

Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶34

11.12.2025