Dismissed¶¶37

Varatharajan v. Santhamani (Died) 1. Bhagiyalakshmi

Madras HC2 Jan 2025CRP/1719/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; N. Sathish Kumar J.; CRP (NPD) No.1719 of 2024; C.M.P.No.9055 of 2024; Varatharajan vs Santhamani (Died), Bhagiyalakshmi, Indhurani, Shanmgapriya @ Priya; Section 115 CPC revision; Order 38 Rule 5 CPC attachment; I.A.No.7 of 2023; O.S.No.11 of 2017; order dated 15/3/2024; IV Additional District & Sessions Court, Bhavani, Erode District; suit dismissed on merits; revision academic; dismissed as infructuous; no costs; decided 2/1/2025.

What did the court decide?

The suit O.S.No.11 of 2017 having been dismissed on merits after appreciation of evidence, the Civil Revision Petition is nothing but academic. ¶¶36

Varatharajan Vs Santhamani (Died) 1. Bhagiyalakshmi — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Civil Revision Petition No.1719 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 2/1/2025

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

Civil Revision Petition (NPD) No.1719 of 2024 a n d

¶7

C.M.P.No.9055 of 2024

Varatharajan

... petitioner

Santhamani (Died)

Bhagiyalakshmi

¶13

Indhurani

¶14

Shanmgapriya @ Priya ... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code

¶16

against the order dated 15/3/2024 made in I.A.No.7 of 2023 in O.S.No.11 of 2017 on the file of the IV Additional District & Sessions Court, Bhavani,

¶17

Erode District.

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Page No:1/4

¶20

Civil Revision Petition No.1719 of 2024

¶21

For petitioner ... Mr.J.Senthil Kumar For respondents ... Service awaited for R.1

¶22

Mr.B.Mohan for R.R.2 and 3.

¶23

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 15/3/2024 made in I.A.No.7 of 2023 in O.S.No.11 of 2017 on the file of the IV Additional District & Sessions Court, Bhavani, Erode District.

¶26

The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

¶27

An application has been filed by the revision petitioner before the trial

¶28

Court in O.S.No.11 of 2017 to raise the attachment passed in I.A.No.7 of 2023, under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the same

¶29

has been allowed. Challenging the same, revision has been filed.

¶30

The suit has been originally filed by son-in-law against mother-in-

¶31

law for recovery of certain amount. Now, it is stated by the learned counsel

¶32

that the suit has been dismissed on merits. As the suit itself has been

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Page No:2/4

¶35

Civil Revision Petition No.1719 of 2024

¶36

dismissed, after appreciation of evidence, revision is nothing but academic.

¶37

In such a view of the matter, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶38

2/1/2025

¶39

mvs.

¶40

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶41

¶42

IV Additional District & Sessions Court, Bhavani, Erode District.

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44