Dismissed¶35

Dhanapal v. Veerapathira Chetty

Madras HC25 Aug 2025CRP/1610/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; CRP No. 1610 of 2022; dismissed for default on 25-08-2025 by V. Lakshminarayanan, J.; petitioner (Dhanapal, Sellammal, Periannan @ Ramesh, Sankar) absent throughout, no counsel appeared; Article 227 revision against District Munsif, Attur (Salem District) order dated 12-08-2021 in I.A.No.781/2019 in O.S.No.283/2012; sought Advocate Commissioner with qualified Taluk Surveyor to locate, identify and measure suit properties and file report and plan; respondent Veerapathira Chetty; no merits decided; no costs.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default, there having been consistently no representation for the petitioner, which the court took to indicate that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition; no costs awarded. ¶35

Dhanapal Vs Veerapathira Chetty — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRP No. 1610 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 25-08-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

CRP No. 1610 of 2022

¶7

1. DHANAPAL

¶8

S/O.Mottaiyan, 7th Ward Kuttakarai, Sentharappatti Village and Post, Gangavelli (Taluk) Salem Dt. and 3 Others

¶9

2. SELLAMMAL

¶10

W/O.Dhanapal, 7th Ward Kuttakarai, Sentharappatti Village and Post, Gangavelli (Taluk) Salem Dt.

¶11

3.Periannan @ Ramesh

¶12

S/O.Dhanapal, 4th Ward, Councillar Colony, Sentharappatti Village and Post, Gangavelli (Taluk) Salem Dt.

¶13

4. SANKAR

¶14

S/O.Dhanapal, Kuttakarai, 7th Ward, Sentharappatti Village and Post, Gangavelli (Taluk) Salem Dt.

¶15

Petitioner(s)

¶16

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CRP No. 1610 of 2022

¶19

1. Veerapathira Chetty

¶20

S/O.Late Venkatraman Chetty, Manottar St, Ward NO.9, Sentharapatti Village and Post, Gangavalli Tk, Salem Dt.

¶21

Respondent(s)

¶22

PRAYER

¶23

Civil Revision Petition filed under Art.227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the order dated 12-08-2021 made in I.A.No.781/2019 in O.S.No.283/2012 on the file of the District Munsif, Attur at Salem District and direct the District Munsif Court, Attur, at Salem District to appoint an Advocate Commissioner with a direction to locate and identify the suit properties, measure the same with help of a qualified Taluk Surveyor and direct him to file the report and plan containing the physical features of the suit properties.

¶24

For Petitioner(s): No appearance

¶25

ORDER

¶26

This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 12.08.2021

¶27

passed in I.A.No.781/2019 in O.S.No.283/2012 on the file of the District Munsif,

¶28

Attur at Salem District and direct the District Munsif Court, Attur at Salem District to appoint an Advocate Commissioner with a direction to locate and identify the suit properties, measure the same with the help of a qualified Taluk

¶29

Surveyor and direct him to file the report and plan containing the physical

¶30

features of the suit properties.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

CRP No. 1610 of 2022

¶33