Revision petition against an appellate court order in a first appeal was withdrawn by the petitioner with endorsement; the High Court permitted withdrawal, dismissed the revision as withdrawn with no costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.106 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 09.01.2025
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.Sathish Kumar C.R.P.No.106 of 2025 and
C.M.P.No.845 of 2025
Maragatham Revision Petitioner
Vs.
1. Paranjothi
2. Prabhakaran ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC to set aside fair order and decreetal order made in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in A.S.No.49 of 2019 dated 18.07.2022, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Ariyalur.
For Revision Petitioner : M/s. M.Kausalya
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw this Revision Petition. He has also made an
endorsement to the said effect in the Revision Petition.
2. The permission sought for by the petitioner is granted.
Accordingly, Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
09.01.2025
sd
C.R.P.No.106 of 2025
N.Sathish Kumar,J,.
sd
To
The Principal Sub Judge, Ariyalur.
C.R.P.No.106 of 2025
09.01.2025
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maragatham
Paranjothi
Prabhakaran
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
