Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

D.Geetha Vs M/S.Jayapriya Chits Funds P Ltd. — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

Home
Madras HC
2025
D.Geetha Vs M/S.Jayapriya Chits Funds P Ltd.D.Geetha v. M/S.Jayapriya Chits Funds P Ltd.

Disposed¶40-41

D.Geetha v. M/S.Jayapriya Chits Funds P Ltd.

Madras HC27 Oct 2025CRP/1024/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025 with C.M.P.No. 5932 of 2025; Article 227 civil revision petition by D. Geetha against M/s. Jayapriya Chits Funds (P) Ltd (Perambur Branch) and others; challenge to order dated 20.12.2024 in EP.No.1037 of 2020 in ARC.No.520 of 2016, XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai; referred to Mediation Centre on 23.04.2025; settled by joint compromise memo dated 11.07.2025 between petitioner and 1st respondent; petition disposed, connected miscellaneous petition closed, no costs; compromise memo made part of Court records; decided 27.10.2025 by Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira; no precedents cited; no monetary figures stated.

What did the court decide?

Civil revision petition disposed of in view of the settlement between the petitioner and the 1st respondent; connected miscellaneous petition (C.M.P.No. 5932 of 2025) closed; no costs.

Why is it important?

In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties (petitioner and 1st respondent, per joint compromise memo dated 11.07.2025), the civil revision petition is disposed of; consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed and no costs are awarded. ¶40-41

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Civil revision petition disposed of in view of the settlement between the petitioner and the 1st respondent; connected miscellaneous petition (C.M.P.No. 5932 of 2025) closed; no costs.

Issue for consideration

Whether the order dated 20.12.2024 in EP.No.1037 of 2020 in ARC.No.520 of 2016 passed by the XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai should be set aside.

Ratio / Principle

In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties (petitioner and 1st respondent, per joint compromise memo dated 11.07.2025), the civil revision petition is disposed of; consequently the connected miscellaneous petition is closed and no costs are awarded.

Key takeaways

The joint memorandum of compromise dated 11.07.2025 filed by the petitioner and the 1st respondent shall form part of the Court records.ratio¶42-43

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (A.D. Jagadish Chandira, J.), 27.10.2025 — C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025 and C.M.P.No. 5932 of 2025 (D. Geetha v. M/s. Jayapriya Chits Funds (P) Ltd, Perambur Branch, and others). Civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the order dated 20.12.2024 of the XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in EP.No.1037 of 2020 in ARC.No.520 of 2016. On 23.04.2025, finding a possibility of settlement, the Court referred the matter to the Mediation Centre; the petitioner and the first respondent thereafter executed a joint compromise memo dated 11.07.2025. Recording the settlement, the Court disposed of the revision petition, closed the connected miscellaneous petition, directed that no costs be awarded, and ordered that the joint memorandum of compromise form part of the Court records. The challenge to the execution order was not adjudicated; no precedent was cited; the terms of the compromise memo are not reproduced in the judgment text.

A

C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.10.2025

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025 and

C.M.P.No. 5932 of 2025

D.Geetha ... Petitioner

Vs

1.M/s.Jayapriya Chits Funds (P) Ltd Perambur Branch, Rep. by its Branch Manager R.Gunasekaran, Having Office at No.12/35, Jawahar Nagar, 1^st Main Road, Perambur, Chennai – 600082.

2.L.Chandrasekar

3.L.Venkata Subramaniayam

4.S.Kalaiselvi

5.M.Murugan ... Respondents

1 / 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India, to set aside the order dated 20.12.2024 in EP.No.1037 of 2020 in

ARC.No.520 of 2016 on the file of XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Petitioner : Mr. A.Thiruvilankumar : For Respondent 1 Mr. C.A.Anburaja : For Respondents No Appearance 2 to 4

O R D E R

This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 20.12.2024 in

EP.No.1037 of 2020 in ARC.No.520 of 2016 on the file of XXVI Assistant

Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

When the matter was listed on 23.04.2025, this Court, finding that

there is a possibility of settlement had referred the matter to the Mediation

Centre.

2 / 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025

Pursuant to the mediation, the matter was settled between the parties,

namely, the petitioner and the 1^st respondent and a joint compromise memo dated 11.07.2025, has been entered into between the parties. The joint compromise memo dated 11.07.2025, is extracted hereunder:

3 / 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025

4 / 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025

In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this civil

revision petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

The joint memorandum of compromise dated 11.07.2025, filed by

the petitioner and the 1^st respondent, shall form part of the Court records.

27.10.2025

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

kan

5 / 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025

To

The XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

6 / 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025

A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

C.R.P.No. 1024 of 2025

27.10.2025

7 / 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the order dated 20.12.2024 in EP.No.1037 of 2020 in ARC.No.520 of 2016 passed by the XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai should be set aside.medium confidence¶18-19

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Constitution of IndiaArticle 227¶18-19

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order dated 20.12.2024 in EP.No.1037 of 2020 in ARC.No.520 of 2016, sought to be set aside by this Article 227 civil revision petition.¶23-25
XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai · 20.12.2024
Prior proceeding
Underlying matter ARC.No.520 of 2016 on the file of the XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in which execution petition EP.No.1037 of 2020 was pursued.¶20
Prior proceeding
On listing on 23.04.2025, the Court found a possibility of settlement and referred the matter to the Mediation Centre.¶26-28
Prior proceeding
Pursuant to mediation, the petitioner and the 1st respondent settled the matter and entered into a joint compromise memo dated 11.07.2025, which was tendered to the Court.¶33

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
D.Geetha¶8
A.Thiruvilankumar
respondent
M/s.Jayapriya Chits Funds (P) Ltd Perambur Branch, Rep. by its Branch Manager R.Gunasekaran¶10
C.A.Anburaja
respondent
L.Chandrasekar¶11
respondent
L.Venkata Subramaniayam¶12
respondent
S.Kalaiselvi¶13
respondent
M.Murugan¶14

Coram

AI extract

A.D. Jagadish Chandiraauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 27 Oct 2025 · October
Registered: 10 Mar 2025
Case no.: CRP/1024/2025
CNR: HCMA010220252025
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: A.d.jagadish Chandira
Disposal: DISPOSED OF
Case type: C.R.P.

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from A.d.jagadish Chandira

Dr.v.P.Kolanchinathan Vs State Rep by
25 Oct 2025
S.Murali Krishnan Vs State rep by the Inspector of Police
25 Oct 2025
Mohammed Aswan Vs State rep by the Inspector of Police
25 Oct 2025
K.R.Balasubramanian Vs Kalaamani
27 Oct 2025
E.Saravanan Vs The State represented by its Inspector of Police
27 Oct 2025
B. Lakshmikanth Vs a. Divya
27 Oct 2025

Cite this judgement

D.Geetha v. M/S.Jayapriya Chits Funds P Ltd., CRP/1024/2025 (MAD), decided on 27 October 2025.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Constitution of IndiaArticle 227

View all statutes

Procedural history4

Order dated 20.12.2024 in EP.No.1037 of 2020 in ARC.No.520 of 2016, sought to be set aside by this Article 227 civil revision petition.XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai · 20.12.2024
Underlying matter ARC.No.520 of 2016 on the file of the XXVI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in which execution petition EP.No.1037 of 2020 was pursued.
On listing on 23.04.2025, the Court found a possibility of settlement and referred the matter to the Mediation Centre.

View full history

Bench / Coram

A.D. Jagadish Chandira

Parties & counsel