Jeyachandran v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: interim custody of seized vehicle; return of impounded car to owner (not accused); Mahindra XUV TN 63 AR 3522; TN Prohibition Act Ss.4(1)(aa), 4(1-A), 4(1)(i); Crime No.251 of 2024 Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Madurai; petition under S.497 B.N.S.S. dismissed by Judicial Magistrate No.VI Madurai (Crl.M.P.No.1750 of 2025, order dt. 21.03.2025) set aside; revision filed under S.438 r/w 442 B.N.S.S.; vehicle deterioration rationale; confiscation proceedings caveat; conditions — Rs.1,00,000 non-refundable deposit to Adyar/Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, Rs.4,00,000 bond with two sureties, original RC deposit, undertaking against illegal use, no alienation/alteration, monthly production before Court; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; single-judge bench (L. Victoria Gowri); decided 11.08.2025.
What did the court decide?
Interim custody of the Mahindra XUV car bearing Registration No.TN 63 AR 3522 ordered returned to the petitioner subject to confiscation proceedings by the Department or the Court, on conditions: (a) Rs.1,00,000 non-refundable deposit to the credit of Adyar Cancer Institute; (b) bond of Rs.4,00,000 with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai; (c) deposit of the original Registration Certificate of the vehicle before that Magistrate; (d) undertaking before the respondent/authority not to use the vehicle for illegal activities, failing which the respondent/trial Court may confiscate it; (e) no alienation and no alteration of the vehicle; (f) production of the vehicle before the Court on the first working day of every English Calendar month until further orders.