Dismissed¶23

M.Kokila v. Vijaya Prakash

Madras HC9 Jul 2025CRL RC/995/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default; non-prosecution; no representation; criminal revision dismissed; impleadment of additional accused (Senthamarai) not considered; Crl.R.C.No.995 of 2025 with Crl.M.P.No.13283 of 2025; S.397 r/w S.401 Cr.P.C.; Ss.438 r/w 442 BNSS; Crl.A.No.99 of 2022 against C.C.No.6348 of 2007; XXII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai; XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet; order challenged dated 13.02.2024; Madras High Court, single judge, 09.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision is dismissed for default for want of representation by the petitioner, and the connected miscellaneous petition (Crl.M.P.No.13283 of 2025) is closed. ¶23

M.Kokila Vs Vijaya Prakash — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.R.C.No. 995 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09.07.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.R.C.No.995 of 2025 & Crl.M.P.No.13283 of 2025

M.Kokila

... Petitioner

1. Vijaya Prakash 2. Gopi

¶11

3. Guber

¶12

4. Prem Kumar

¶13

5. Station House Officer, (SI of Police) R2, Police station, Kodambakkam, Chennai - 24 6. Senthamarai ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., and 438 r/w 442 of BNSS, to call for the records in C.A.No.99 of 2022 on the file of the learned Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, examine the legality, the propriety and correctness of the proceedings before the trial court and its Judgment dated 03.01.2022 in C.C.No.9160 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.99 of 2022 preferred against C.C.No.6348 of 2007 on the file of the learned XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai and set aside the order of the learned Sessions Judge passed in Crl.M.P.No.9160 of 2022 in Crl.Appeal No.99 of 2022 dated 13.02.2024 and direct impleadment of the 6th

¶15

Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.R.C.No. 995 of 2025

¶18

respondent above named Mrs.Senthamarai, as one more accused in Crl.A.No.99 of 2022 preferred against C.C.No.6348 of 2007, now pending disposal before the learned XXII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶19

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath for R5 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

When the petition was taken up for hearing on 08.07.2025, there was no

¶22

representation for the petitioner, therefore, the case was ordered to be posted on 09.07.2025 under the caption 'for dismissal'.

¶23

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, again, there is no representation for the petitioner, hence the present Revsion is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶24

09.07.2025

¶25

Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order ssd

¶26

Page 2 of 4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Crl.R.C.No. 995 of 2025

¶29

¶30