Babu v. Vengadesan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a criminal revision to set aside a Magistrate's order dismissing an application for expert verification of a video recording. The Court held that such opinion is not conclusive and warrants no interference, dismissing the revision.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner at liberty to work out remedy known to law.
What the court decided
Crl.RC.No.564 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.03.2025
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.RC.No.564 of 2023
Babu
... Petitioner
Vs.
Vengadesan
... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C. to set aside the order dated 27.01.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.65 of 2022 in C.C.No.92 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Magistrate Level at Tiruvannamalai.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.P.Sekar For Respondent : Mr.T.Ganesan
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Magistrate's order dismissing an application for expert opinion on a video recording regarding the transaction of a dishonoured cheque.
Whether expert opinion on a video recording is conclusive proof of the facts of the case in a cheque dishonour matter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Babu
- respondent
Vengadesan
Coram
P. Velmurugan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court