Allowed¶21

K. Lakshmanasamy v. Sharmila Kumari Rajeev

Madras HC2 Sept 2025CRL RC/1616/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Crl.R.C.No.1616 of 2025, decided 02.09.2025 by T.V.Thamilselvi J.; petitioner K.Lakshmanasamy (advocate M.Rakhi) v. respondent Sharmila Kumari Rajeev; revision under Section 438 r/w Section 442 of BNSS, 2023 to set aside the dismissed-for-default order dated 12.07.2024 in C.C.No.384 of 2021 of Fast Track Court - III, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet; revision allowed and order set aside.

What did the court decide?

The dismissed-for-default order dated 12.07.2024 in C.C.No.384 of 2021 (Fast Track Court - III, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet) is set aside; the Criminal Revision Case is allowed. ¶21

K. Lakshmanasamy Vs Sharmila Kumari Rajeev — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.R.C.No.1616 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02.09.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

Crl.R.C.No.1616 of 2025

K.Lakshmanasamy

.... Petitioner

Sharmila Kumari Rajeev .... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 r/w Section 442 of BNSS, 2023, prayed to set aside the dismissed for default order in C.C.No.384 of 2021 dated 12.07.2024 on the file of Fast Track Court - III, Metropolitan Magistrate at Saidapet.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rakhi

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This Criminal Revision Case is filed to set aside the dismissed for default order in C.C.No.384 of 2021 dated 12.07.2024 on the file of Fast Track Court - III, Metropolitan Magistrate at Saidapet.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.R.C.No.1616 of 2025

¶17

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are arguable

¶18

points available in that case and the petitioner has got a fair chance of succeeding in the case and hence, he prayed to set aside the order passed by the Trial Court dated 12.07.2024.

¶19

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

¶20

4.Considering facts and circumstances of the case and the submission

¶21

made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there are arguable points available as well as the petitioner has got a fair chance of succeeding in that case, this Court is inclined to allow the revision and accordingly, the order passed by the Fast Track Court - III, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet in C.C.No.384 of 2021 dated 12.07.2024 is set aside and the revision is allowed.

¶22

02.09.2025

¶23

Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order

¶24

pam

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Crl.R.C.No.1616 of 2025