Allowed

Tamilselvi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC9 Oct 2025CRL OP(MD)/8563/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought in a forgery and cheating case where forged documents were allegedly created and mortgaged with a bank. Court granted bail on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to daily police reporting and conditions against tampering or absconding.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, daily reporting to respondent police until further orders.

Tamilselvi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 09.10.2025

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶6

CRL OP(MD)No.8563 of 2025

¶7

Tamilselvi ...Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The State of Tamil Nadu, Represent by the Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.13 of 2025) ... Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Muthu Ganesa Pandian

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS

¶13

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.13 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

¶14

ORDER: The Court made the following order :-

¶15

1/6

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC in Crime No.13 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶18

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons have created forged documents and mortgaged the same with the bank. Hence, a case has been registered as against the petitioner.

¶19

3.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the offences committed by the petitioner are serious in nature.

¶21

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

¶22

inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶23

2/6

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the

¶26

event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of The Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Madurai, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on further conditions that:

¶27

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

¶28

[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders and cooperate with the interrogation.

¶29

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶30

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶31

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned

¶32

Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala

¶33

[(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶34

3/6

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under

Section 269 of BNS.

09.10.2025

KSA

4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

¶43

1.The Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Madurai.

¶44

2.The Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Madurai District.

¶45

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶46

5/6

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

S.SRIMATHY,J

¶49

KSA

¶50

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8563 of 2025

¶51

Date : 09.10.2025

¶52

6/6

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tamilselvi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamilselvi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumar Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

P.Sujith Dev Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Kalirdevi Vs State of Tamilnadu

Sathish Kumar Vs The State of Taminladu, Rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police

Victoria Selus Vs The state of Tamil Nadu

Murali Vs The State of Tamil Nadu