vellaisamy v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

Madras HC30 Apr 2025CRL OP(MD)/8135/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench (Criminal Jurisdiction); CRL OP(MD) No.8135 of 2025; R. Sakthivel, J.; decided 30.04.2025. Keywords: anticipatory bail; pre-arrest bail; Section 482 BNSS / Sec.482 of BNSS; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023; no reasonable apprehension of arrest; police enquiry closed; petition dismissed; Ulagampatti Police Station; Sivagangai District; Crime No. Not Known of 2025.

What did the court decide?

The Court accepted and recorded the learned Government Advocate's submission that the respondent-police had conducted an enquiry and closed the matter, with the consequence that the petitioners have no reasonable apprehension of arrest. ¶20

vellaisamy Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.8135 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 30.04.2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.8135 of 2025

¶8

1.Vellaisamy 2.Ajithkumar ... Petitioners/Accused Rank Not Known

¶9

¶10

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Ulagampatti Police Station, Sivagangai District. Crime No.Not Known of 2025 ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Ayyanar Prem Kumar For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS

¶13

PRAYER :-

¶14

For anticipatory bail in Crime No.Not Known of 2025 on the file of the respondent-Police.

¶15

1/3

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶18

CRL OP(MD). No.8135 of 2025

¶19

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners on 28.04.2025 under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

¶20

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that respondent-Police conducted enquiry and closed the petition and therefore, the petitioners have no reasonable apprehension of arrest at the hands of the respondent-Police. The submission is recorded.

¶21