Allowed

G Prabu v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC27 Mar 2025CRL OP(MD)/5025/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 482 of BNSS in a crime involving alleged stealing of a two-wheeler, subject to conditions including bond execution, appearance, and restrictions on interfering with witnesses. The court noted the petitioner's habit of pending cases but deemed custodial interrogation unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to execution of bond with two sureties, regular appearance before Magistrate, and strict adherence to conditions including no tampering with witnesses and no leaving

G Prabu Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.5025 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 27/03/2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.5025 of 2025

¶8

G.Prabu ... Petitioner/Accused Rank Not Known

¶9

Vs.,

¶10

The State of Tamil nadu, rep by the Inspector of Police, Mattuthavani Police Station, Madurai City. (Crime No.758 of 2024) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Mari Chelliah Prabhu Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi,

¶13

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS

¶15

PRAYER :-

¶16

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.758 of 2024 on the file of the RespondentPolice.

¶17

1/6

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CRL OP(MD). No.5025 of 2025

¶20

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶21

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on

¶22

17.03.2025 under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

¶23

The petitioner/Accused Rank Not Known apprehends arrest at the hands of

¶24

the respondent-police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC, in Crime No.758 of 2024 on the file of the respondent-police.

¶25

The case of the prosecution is that on 12.06.2024, the defacto complainant came on his two-wheeler, namely, Splender + bearing Registration No.TN-64-P-7915 to attend his relative's ear piercing function at KPA Marriage Mahal, Pandikovil road. After parking his two-wheeler, he went inside Mahal. But, when he returned back, he found that his two-wheeler was missing. Hence the case.

¶26

Mr.C.M.Mari Chelliah Prabhu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the respondent-police has falsely implicated the petitioner as an accused. He however submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. Accordingly, he prays to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶27

2/6

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

CRL OP(MD). No.5025 of 2025

¶30

Per contra , Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent-police, submits that the petitioner is a habitual offender. He further submits that there are totally 12 cases pending against the petitioner, and therefore, if pre-arrest bail is granted to the petitioner, he may commit similar offence. Hence, he opposes to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶31

Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records.

¶32

In view of the offences allegedly committed by the petitioner, this Court is of

¶33

the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary for the Investigation Agency in this case. Further, the petitioner has permanent residence, and therefore, there is less possibility of absconding. Considering the same, and with a view to give one more opportunity to the petitioner to reform himself, this Court is inclined to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.

¶34

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest or in the event of his surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, within a period of 15 days from the date on which this order copy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai.

¶35

3/6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

CRL OP(MD). No.5025 of 2025

¶38

(ii) The petitioner shall appear and sign before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, on all working days at 10.00 a.m., until further order.

¶39

(iii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, shall obtain a copy of anyone of identity proofs to ensure their identity.

¶40

(iv) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the respondent-Police as and when required.

¶41

(v) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper the evidence.

¶42

(vi) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

¶43

(vii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

¶44

(viii) The petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the concerned Magistrate.

¶45

(ix) The petitioner should not enter into the defacto complainant's house and workplace.

¶46

4/6

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

CRL OP(MD). No.5025 of 2025

¶49

(x) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Judicial

¶50

Magistrate/Trial Judge is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are imposed by themselves as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

¶51

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the conditions stated supra .

¶52

sd/27/03/2025

¶53

/ TRUE COPY /

¶54

30/04/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶55

Rmk

¶56

¶57

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai.

¶58

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.II,Madurai.

¶59

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai.

¶60

4.The Inspector of Police, Mattuthavani Police Station, Madurai City.

¶61

5/6

¶62

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶63

CRL OP(MD). No.5025 of 2025

¶64

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶65

+1. CC to M/S.MARI CHELLIAH PRABHU.C.M Advocate SR.No.3619(I) DT.28.03.2025

¶66

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5025 of 2025 Date :27/03/2025

¶67

PP/SAR. /02.05.2025/6P/7C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

¶68

6/6

¶69

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G Prabu v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G Prabu v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Sanjay Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Krishnan Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Murugan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Rajesh Vs The State of Tamilnadu

S.Karuppasamy Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Ramesh Vs State of Tamilnadu