Disposed¶20

Balasubramanian v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Paramakudi Town

Madras HC27 Oct 2025CRL OP(MD)/18275/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quash petition — FIR Crime No.79 of 2024 — Paramakudi Town Police Station — mistake of fact found in investigation — final report filed before Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi — nothing survives — petition closed — Section 528 BNSS, 2023 — Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18275 of 2025 — Madurai Bench of Madras High Court — Sunder Mohan J. — 27.10.2025.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief adjudicated; the Criminal Original Petition was closed as nothing survived for adjudication following the filing of the final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. ¶20

Balasubramanian Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Paramakudi Town — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18275 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 27.10.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18275 of 2025

Balasubramanian

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Paramakudi Town, Ramanathapuram District. (Crime No.79 of 2024)

¶11

2.Venkatraman .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the case registered in impugned First Information Report in Crime No.79 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent Police and quash the same as illegal.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Arun For 1^st Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18275 of 2025

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report registered in Crime No.79 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent Police Station.

¶19

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that during the course of investigation, it was found to be a case of mistake of fact and, accordingly, a final report was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi.

¶20