Dismissed¶25

Senthilnathan v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC16 Sept 2025CRL OP(MD)/15243/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench (Sunder Mohan, J.), 16.09.2025, Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15243 of 2025 (with Crl.M.P.(MD).No.12367 of 2025): Senthilnathan, Susila and Valli v. State of Tamil Nadu (Karuppayurani Police Station) and Mohan. Quashing petition under S.528 BNSS 2023 against FIR in Crime No.92 of 2025 dismissed as infructuous after the State reported completion of investigation and filing of final report before Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai; liberty reserved to challenge the Final Report. No case law cited; no costs or quantum awarded.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to the petitioners to challenge the Final Report filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai; connected Crl.M.P.(MD).No.12367 of 2025 closed. ¶25

Senthilnathan Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15243 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 16.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15243 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.12367 of 2025

1.Senthilnathan

2.Susila

3.Valli

... Petitioners

Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai.

¶13

2.Mohan ...Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya

¶15

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to call for the records relating to the impugned FIR in Crime No.92 of 2025 on the file of the Karuppayurani Police

¶16

Station, Madurai District and quash the same.

¶17

For Petitioners : Mr.RM.Arun Swaminathan

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15243 of 2025

¶21

For R-1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

¶22

ORDER

¶23

The petitioners seek quashing of the FIR in Crime No.92 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent.

¶24

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would submit that the investigation is now completed and a final report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication.

¶25

In view of the same, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the above said Final Report, if so advised. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶26

16.09.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No cp

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15243 of 2025

¶30

¶31