Disposed¶26

A. Kanagasaranya v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC10 Sept 2025CRL OP(MD)/14888/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Crl.O.P.(MD) 14888 of 2025; Section 528 BNSS 2023; police interference; money dispute; enquiry completion timeline; complaint by Lekharani and Priya; Lalitha Kumari (2014) 2 SCC 1 preliminary enquiry dictum; Inspector of Police Sivagangai Taluk Police Station; Superintendent of Police Sivagangai District; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Sunder Mohan J.; petition disposed of; direction to conclude enquiry within one week.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to conclude the enquiry within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order; Criminal Original Petition disposed of accordingly. ¶26

A. Kanagasaranya Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14888 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14888 of 2025

A.Kanagasaranya

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Sivagangai Taluk Police Station, Sivagangai District.

¶12

...Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023,

¶14

to direct the 2^nd respondent not to interfere with the money dispute between the petitioner and her friends.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ranjithkumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The petitioner has sought for a direction to the second respondent not to

¶18

interfere with the money dispute between the petitioner and her friends.

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14888 of 2025

¶22

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would

¶23

submit that the petitioner has not been harassed by the second respondent; that she was called for an enquiry based on the complaint given by one Lekharani and Priya; that the above enquiry would be completed within a period of one week by following the dictum of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lalitha Kumari vs. Government of U.P and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1.

¶24