Rukmani v. the State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Quashing of final report/charge sheet; section 498A IPC cruelty; mother of accused (A2) - her statement that her son was 'like that' from childhood held not to constitute any offence; inaction/silence of mother argued as cruelty but petition allowed; matrimonial dispute; minor children's statements under section 164 Cr.P.C. did not implicate A2; Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Salem; Cr.No.5/2024, All Women Police Station, Ammapet; petition under section 528 BNSS; Madras High Court CRL OP No. 7214 of 2025; N. Sathish Kumar J.; decided 22-10-2025; Rs.69 lakhs alleged withdrawal by A1 mentioned in prosecution narrative.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Original Petition allowed; final report in Spl.C.C.No.160 of 2024 (Spl. Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Salem) quashed as against the petitioner/A2 alone.