Dismissed¶24

Anandan @ Pani Anand v. State, Represented by the Inspector of Police

Madras HC1 Dec 2025CRL OP/32705/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Crl.O.P.No.32705 of 2025, decided 01.12.2025 by K.RAJASEKAR, J.: anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 sought by Anandan @ Pani Anand and Veluchamy (A3 & A4) in Crime No.186 of 2025 (offences under Ss.296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 121(1), 132, 351(2) BNS, 2023 r/w 4 TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act). Dismissed as a second application without change in circumstances; earlier application dismissed in Crl.O.P.No.27015 of 2025 on 07.10.2025.

What did the court decide?

A second anticipatory bail application filed without any change in circumstances is not entertainable. ¶23

Anandan @ Pani Anand Vs State, Represented by the Inspector… — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Crl.OP.No.32705 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 01.12.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.32705 of 2025

¶7

1.Anandan @ Pani Anand 2.Veluchamy

¶8

... Petitioners/A3 & A4

¶9

Vs. State, Represented by The Inspector of Police, V-6, Nolambur Police Station, Tiruvallur District. ... Respondent (Crime No.186 of 2025)

¶10

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.186 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Pandian For Respondent : Mrs.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioners, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police

¶14

for the offence under Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 121(1), 132, 351(2) of

¶15

BNS, 2023 r/w 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women

¶16

Act, in Crime No.186 of 2025 , on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶17

1/2

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Crl.OP.No.32705 of 2025

¶20

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

¶21

ssi

¶22

2.When the matter taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent reported that this is the second anticipatory bail application and that the earlier anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.27015 of 2025 dated 07.10.2025.

¶23

Now, the petitioner has filed the present anticipatory bail application that too without any change in circumstances is not entertainable. Since, there is no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶24