Dismissed¶26

J.Naresh v. State Rep. by

Madras HC15 Dec 2025CRL OP/32460/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, K. Rajasekar J., order dated 15-12-2025, CRL OP No. 32460 of 2025 (J.Naresh v. State, Inspector of Police, G2 Periamet Police Station). Anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS sought in Crime No.274 of 2024 for offence under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) NDPS Act; third application after dismissals dated 12.02.2025 (Crl.OP.No.2006 of 2025) and 21.08.2025 (Crl.OP No.9293 of 2025); no change in circumstances; repeat application not entertainable; petition dismissed.

What did the court decide?

An anticipatory bail application filed a third time without any change in circumstances is not entertainable. ¶25

J.Naresh Vs State Rep. by — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL OP No. 32460 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15-12-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶6

CRL OP No. 32460 of 2025

J.Naresh

Petitioner(s)

State Rep. by

The Inspector of Police, G2, Periamet Police Station, Chennai.

¶12

Respondent(s)

¶13

PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to enlarge the Petitioner herein on bail in the event of her arrest by the Respondent in Crime No.274 of 2024 on the file of the respondent with conditions or pass any other orders as this Honble Court.

¶14

For Petitioner(s): Mr.Prabhakaran TR

¶15

For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent

¶18

police for the offence under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) NDPS Act, in Crime

¶19

No.274 of 2024 , on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶20

2.When the matter taken up for hearing today, the learned Government

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

CRL OP No. 32460 of 2025

¶23

Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent reported that this is the third anticipatory bail application and the earlier two anticipatory bail applications filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court on 12.02.2025 in Crl.OP.No.2006 of 2025 and on 21.08.2025 in Crl.OP No.9293 of 2025 respectively.

¶24

Now, the petitioner has filed the present anticipatory bail application

¶25

without any change in circumstances is not entertainable. Since, there is no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶26