Disposed

K.Nagalakshmi, Part-in-Person v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC22 Apr 2025CRL OP/32180/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a criminal original petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for directions to investigate. Respondent submitted the charge sheet. Court directed respondent to serve the charge sheet and closed the petition allowing petitioner to file prosecution complaint.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to serve the charge sheet; petitioner may file prosecution complaint; petition closed.

K.Nagalakshmi, Part-in-Person Vs the Commissioner of Police — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.32180 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.04.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.32180 of 2024

¶7

K.Nagalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.

¶8

The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner Office, Avadi, Chennai – 600 054.

¶9

The Inspector of Police, T9, Pattabiram Police Station, Pattabiram, Chennai – 600 072. ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents to further investigate and to take appropriate action against the accused and to file a detailed report before this Court within a stipulated time.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Nagalakshmi Party-in-person For Respondents : Mr. A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

Page 1 of 4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Crl.O.P.No.32180 of 2024

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents to conduct further investigation in Crime No.229 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 324 & 506(2) of IPC.

¶17

On instruction, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the second respondent registered FIR in Crime No.299 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 376, 324 & 506(2) of IPC. After completion of investigation, the FIR has been closed as “further action dropped”. The referred charge sheet has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur, on 16.04.2025.

¶18

Considering the above submissions, the second respondent is directed to serve the referred charge sheet to the petitioner and on receipt of the same, the petitioner is at liberty to file protest petition before the concerned jurisdictional Court in the manner known to law.

¶19

Page 2 of 4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Crl.O.P.No.32180 of 2024

¶22

4 . Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands closed.

¶23

22.04.2025

¶24

Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order

¶25

rts

¶26

¶27

The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner Office, Avadi, Chennai – 600 054.

¶28

The Inspector of Police, T9, Pattabiram Police Station, Pattabiram, Chennai – 600 072.

¶29

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

¶30

Page 3 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.32180 of 2024

¶33

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶34

rts

¶35

Crl.O.P.No.32180 of 2024

¶36

22.04.2025

¶37

Page 4 of 4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.Nagalakshmi, Part-in-Person v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Nagalakshmi, Part-in-Person v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Jayamoorthy @ Moorthy Vs State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police

Sheila Vs State Rep. by

J.Janakiraman Vs State Rep by

P.Vasanthi Vs the Commissioner

Gokulakrishnan Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep by Its, the Inspector of Police

R.Radha @ Radharamalingam Vs Madhan Raj