Anticipatory bail petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear or secure representation on two consecutive listing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.OP.No.32124 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
Crl.O.P.No.32124 of 2025
Ragavendra Gupta ... Petitioner
Vs. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch (DCB), Krishnagiri Police Station. .... Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest by the respondent police in Cr.No.17 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
On 09.12.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner; hence,
the matter was listed today under the caption “for dismissal.” Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.
1/2
Crl.OP.No.32124 of 2025
K.RAJASEKAR, J.
Vv
for non-prosecution.
17.12.2025
Vv
To
Crl.O.P.No.32124 of 2025
2/2
Crl.OP.No.32124 of 2025
3/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ragavendra Gupta
The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch (DCB), Krishnagiri Police Station
K.Rajasekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
