Compliance petition regarding a prior order dated 13.11.2025 in Criminal Original Petition. The court noted the counsel's submission that the order has been complied with and filed a cost memo, and recorded the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.30077 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.12.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.30077 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.Nos.20518 and 20519 of 2025
… Petitioners
Vs.
The Inspector of Police
All Women Police Station, Salem Town
… Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr.D.Rajagopal
For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan
Additional Public Prosecutor for R1
Mr.A.K.R.Ravi for R2
O R D E R
Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for reporting compliance”.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the order of this Court dated 13.11.2025 has been complied with and he also filed a cost memo to that effect.
3. The same is recorded.
08.12.2025
ksa-2
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
1/2
Crl.O.P.No.30077 of 2025
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.
ksa-2
To
1.The Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Salem
All Women Police Station , Salem Town
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai
Crl.O.P.No.30077 of 2025
08.12.2025
2/2
A.M.Krishnan
Sumathi
Sathishkumar
State Rep. By The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Salem Town
Chinnaponnu
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
