Dismissed¶29

Mohamed kasim v. The State rep by

Madras HC26 Sept 2025CRL OP/26842/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail denied; bail refusal; COTPA Act 2003 Sections 7(5) 20(2); Section 123 BNS; Section 483 BNSS 2023; banned tobacco products Hans Swagath Cool Lip Vimal V-1; 571 kg contraband; value Rs.5,71,000/-; Crime No.325 of 2025; F-4 Kaveripakkam Police Station; Goondas Act detention under progress; investigation pending; accused A1 Mohamed Kasim; arrest 07.09.2025; High Court of Judicature at Madras; Justice K. Rajasekar; Crl.O.P.No.26842 of 2025; petition dismissed 26.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Considering the facts, gravity of offence, huge quantity of contraband involved in the case and the fact that the investigation is pending, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. ¶28

Mohamed kasim Vs The State rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.26842 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 26-09-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR

¶6

CRL OP NO.26842 of 2025

Mohamed Kasim

... Petitioner/ A1

The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, F-4 Kaveripakkam Police Station, Tamil Nadu - 632 508. (Crime No.325 of 2025) ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.325 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J. Saravana Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.26842 of 2025

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.09.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 7(5), 20(2) of

¶19

COTPA Act, 2003 r/w. Section 123 of BNS in Crime No.325 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶20

The case of the prosecution is that on 07.09.2025, while the respondent police were on their routine patrol and inspection duty, they found that the petitioner along with other accused was involved in illegal transportation of 571 kilograms of banned tobacco products such as Hans, Swagath, Cool Lip, Vimal and V-1 valued nearly about Rs.5,71,000/-. Hence, this case.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was falsely implicated in this case and he is in judicial custody since 07.09.2025 and the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.O.P.No.26842 of 2025

¶25

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing

¶26

for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and states that huge quantity of contraband involved in this case; that the petitioner herein is arrayed as A1 and the detention of the petitioner under Goondas Act is under progress; and that the investigation is pending.

¶27

Considering the facts, gravity of offence, huge quantity of

¶28

contraband involved in this case and the fact that the investigation of this case is pending, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶29

6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed.

26.09.2025

stn