P.T.Dhinakar v. the State Rep by, the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.O.P.No.2339 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Madras, decided 30.01.2025, Justice P.Velmurugan (author). Petitioner: P.T.Dhinakar (Mr.P.Dhananjayan); Respondents: State through Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Nagapattinam (Crime No.22 of 2022) and K.Ashokumar (Mr.J.Umacharan). Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. sought time-bound disposal of C.C.No.125 of 2023 before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Nagapattinam. Relying on Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi v. The State of Maharashtra (Criminal Appeal No.4758 of 2024, dated 25.11.2024) and following the quoted Constitution Bench dictum in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2024) 6 SCC 267 (para 47.3), the Court declined to fix a specific time limit, directing only completion of trial as early as possible as per roaster; petition dismissed.
What did the court decide?
In view of the above decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court is not inclined to fix any specific time limit to expedite the trial; however, the trial Court is directed to complete the trial as early as possible as per roaster.