G.Tanish Madhav v. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.O.P.No.20603 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Madras, decided 17.10.2025 by K. Rajasekar, J. Petitioner G. Tanish Madhav (advocate: G. Krishnakumar) sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS 2023 in Crime No.70 of 2024, Central Crime Branch EDF-I Wing, Vepery, Chennai (State; advocate: S. Udayakumar, Government Advocate), for offences under Sections 406, 420, 506(i) and 120-B IPC. Investigation complete, final report ready, petitioner not arrayed as accused; no apprehension of arrest; petition stood closed. No anticipatory bail granted. Keywords: anticipatory bail, BNSS 2023 S.482, IPC 406/420/506(i)/120-B, crime closed, no arraignment.
What did the court decide?
None; the petition was closed without enlarging the petitioner on anticipatory bail, as the Court found no subsisting apprehension of arrest. ¶18