Raj Kannan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court (Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira, 07.01.2026) dismissed as infructuous Crl.O.P.No.19874 of 2022, a Section 528 BNSS / Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition by Raj Kannan, Sampath and Chandra seeking quashal of FIR No.35 of 2021 dated 16.10.2021 of AWPS, Thiruvannamalai (respondents: SHO/AWPS-State and Shindhujaa), after the Additional Public Prosecutor reported the FIR closed as “further action dropped” (FAD); connected Crl.M.P.No.13062 of 2022 closed. No precedent cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Recording the Additional Public Prosecutor's submission that the first respondent police closed the FIR in Crime No.35 of 2021 as “further action dropped” (FAD), the Court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition as having become infructuous and closed the connected miscellaneous petition (Crl.M.P.No.13062 of 2022).