Allowed¶26

Ambikapathi v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Sept 2025CRL OP/18901/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; CRL OP 18901/2025; Ambikapathi v. State of Tamil Nadu; K.Rajasekar J.; 17-09-2025; Section 439(1)(B) BNSS 2023; modification of bail condition; Crl.M.P.No.658/2025; District and Sessions Judge Tirupattur; daily appearance and signing before Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirupattur; Cr.No.366/2022; condition relaxed on compliance submission; petition ordered.

What did the court decide?

Relaxation of the condition imposed on the petitioner requiring daily appearance and signing before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirupattur at 10.00 am on all working days. ¶26

Ambikapathi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL OP No. 18901 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 17-09-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶6

CRL OP No. 18901 of 2025

Ambikapathi

Petitioner(s)

The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Tirupattur Taluk Police Station, Tirupattur District. Cr.No.366/2022.

¶11

Respondent(s)

¶12

PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439(1)(B) of BNSS, 2023, to modify the condition imposed that the petitioner shall appear and sign before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirupatttur, daily at 10.00 am on all working days until further orders in Crl.M.P.No.658/2025 in Cr.No.366/2022 by The District and Sessions Judge, Tirupattur District on 22.04.2025.

¶13

For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Venkateswaran

¶14

For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRL OP No. 18901 of 2025

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to modify the condition

¶19

imposed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Tirupattur District in

¶20

Crl.M.P.No.658 of 2025 dated 22.04.2025.

¶21

Heard both sides.

¶22

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the

¶23

petitioner is complying with the conditions regularly.

¶24

Considering the said submission, the condition imposed against the

¶25

petitioner is relaxed.

¶26

5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

17-09-2025

gbi

Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

CRL OP No. 18901 of 2025

¶33

¶34

1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Tirupattur Taluk Police Station, Tirupattur District. Cr.No.366/2022. 2.The District and Sessions Judge, Tirupattur. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

CRL OP No. 18901 of 2025

¶37

K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi

¶38

CRL OP No. 18901 of 2025

¶39

17-09-2025

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis