Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

S.Anbuchelvan Vs State rep by — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2025
S.Anbuchelvan Vs State rep byS.Anbuchelvan v. State rep by

Allowed¶27

S.Anbuchelvan v. State rep by

Bail condition – relaxation – anticipatory bail

Madras HC6 Oct 2025CRL OP/18699/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, K. Rajasekar J., 08.10.2025 — Crl.M.P.No.18699 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025, S. Bharathiraja v. The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Airport St.Thomas Mount Police Station, Chennai District (Crime No.27 of 2025): relaxation of anticipatory-bail condition (para 6(d)) requiring daily reporting before respondent police at 10.30 a.m.; offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(3) and 351(3) of BNS; petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 allowed; regular compliance conceded by Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Mr.A.Gopinath; petitioner's counsel Mr.P.Balamurugan; other bail conditions left unaltered.

What did the court decide?

Relaxation of the para 6(d) condition in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 (order dated 19.06.2025) requiring the petitioner to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; all other conditions remain unaltered.

Why is it important?

The condition imposed in para 6(d) in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 dated 19.06.2025, namely that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders, is relaxed; the other conditions shall remain unaltered. ¶22

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Relaxation of the para 6(d) condition in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 (order dated 19.06.2025) requiring the petitioner to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; all other conditions remain unaltered.

Issue for consideration

Whether the condition imposed in para 6(d) of the order dated 19.06.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025, requiring the petitioner to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders, should be relaxed.

Court's answer

The condition imposed in para 6(d) in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 dated 19.06.2025, namely that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders, is relaxed; the other conditions shall remain unaltered.

Ratio / Principle

The criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered accordingly.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail condition — relaxation — anticipatory bail — Petitioner, granted anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(3) and 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.27 of 2025 (Airport St.Thomas Mount Police Station, Chennai District), filed this petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking relaxation of the condition in para 6(d) of the order dated 19.06.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025, which required him to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner had been complying with the condition regularly. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of the offence, the Court relaxed the para 6(d) condition and directed that the other conditions shall remain unaltered; the criminal miscellaneous petition was ordered. (K. Rajasekar, J.; decision dated 08.10.2025.)

A

Crl.M.P.No.18699 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

Crl.M.P.No.18699 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025

Mr.S.Bharathiraja

... Petitioner

Vs.

The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Airport St.Thomas Mount Police Station, Chennai District. Crime No.27 of 2025

... Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to relax the condition, “the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, every working day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders” imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 order dated 19.06.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Balamurugan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ORDER

Crl.M.P.No.18699 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025

The petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(3) and 351(3) of BNS,

in Crime No.27 of 2025. Thus, the petitioner seeks relaxation for the condition imposed in para 6(d) “the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders” in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 dated 19.06.2025.

2 . The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the

respondent police submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of offence, the condition imposed in para 6(d) in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 dated 19.06.2025, “the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders” is relaxed . The other conditions shall remain unaltered.

2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.18699 of 2025

in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025

Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered.

08.10.2025

cda

To

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Alandur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Airport St.Thomas Mount Police Station, Chennai District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.18699 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

cda

Crl.M.P.No.18699 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025

08.10.2025

4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.18699 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025

5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the condition imposed in para 6(d) of the order dated 19.06.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025, requiring the petitioner to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders, should be relaxed.¶19
The court held
The condition imposed in para 6(d) in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 dated 19.06.2025, namely that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders, is relaxed; the other conditions shall remain unaltered.ratio¶22

Statutes considered

2 provisions across 2 enactments

AI extract

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023528¶12
BNS296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(3), 351(3)¶18

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Condition in para 6(d) of the order dated 19.06.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 requiring the petitioner to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.¶12
High Court of Judicature at Madras (this Court) · 19.06.2025
Prior proceeding
Crime No.27 of 2025 registered at Airport St.Thomas Mount Police Station, Chennai District.¶10
Prior proceeding
Petitioner granted anticipatory bail for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(3) and 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.27 of 2025, subject to conditions including the para 6(d) daily-reporting condition.¶18

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Mr.S.Bharathiraja¶7
Mr.P.Balamurugan
respondent
The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Airport St.Thomas Mount Police Station, Chennai District¶10
Mr.A.Gopinath

Coram

AI extract

K.RAJASEKARauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 6 Oct 2025 · October
Registered: 26 Jun 2025
Case no.: CRL OP/18699/2025
CNR: HCMA011130102025
Bench: K.rajasekar
Disposal: WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Case type: Crl.M.P.

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K.rajasekar

Aljiyani Vs The State Rep by, Inspector of Police
26 Sept 2025
R.Kannan Vs The State Rep by, The Sub Inspector of Police
26 Sept 2025
Shahad Vs The State Rep. by
26 Sept 2025
Karthi Vs The State by Inspector of Police
6 Oct 2025
Sathish Vs State rep by The lnspector of police
6 Oct 2025
Palani Vs State represented by
6 Oct 2025

Cite this judgement

S.Anbuchelvan v. State rep by, CRL OP/18699/2025 (MAD), decided on 6 October 2025.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes2

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023528
BNS296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(3), 351(3)

View all statutes

Procedural history3

Condition in para 6(d) of the order dated 19.06.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.17161 of 2025 requiring the petitioner to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.High Court of Judicature at Madras (this Court) · 19.06.2025
Crime No.27 of 2025 registered at Airport St.Thomas Mount Police Station, Chennai District.
Petitioner granted anticipatory bail for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(3) and 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.27 of 2025, subject to conditions including the para 6(d) daily-reporting condition.

View full history

Bench / Coram

K.RAJASEKAR

Parties & counsel