Sathya v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for extension of time in connection with a pending trial; on hearing, the Government Advocate reported the trial itself had been disposed of by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram. The High Court held no further orders were required and closed the petition without adjudicating any issue.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.18384 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
Crl.O.P.No.18384 of 2025
Sathya ... Petitioner
Vs. State: Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kundrathur Police Station, Kancheepuram District. ... Respondent (Crime No.647 of 2016) For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER
This Petition has been filed before this Court under the caption "For extension of time" along with the report sent by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram in D.No.3616/SC/2025 dated 04.09.2025.
- When the matter taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent upon instructions reported that the trial in S.C.No.35 of 2020 itself was disposed of by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sathya
- respondent
State: Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kundrathur Police Station, Kancheepuram District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court