Disposed¶22

Prakash M Swamy v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Sept 2025CRL OP/16601/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Section 482 BNSS 2023; Crime No.14 of 2025; AWPS-W23 Royapettah; Prakash M Swamy; modification of para 3 of order dated 19.09.2025; false complaint; tampering with evidence; final stage of prosecution evidence; Registry to issue fresh order copy; K. Rajasekar J.; Madras High Court; For Being Mentioned.

What did the court decide?

Para No.3 of the order dated 19.09.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.16601 of 2025 stands modified as proposed, and the Registry is to issue a fresh order copy giving effect to the modification. ¶22

Prakash M Swamy Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.16601 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 08-10-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR

¶6

CRL OP NO.16601 of 2025

¶7

Prakash M Swamy The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, AWPS - W23 Royapettah. (Crime No.14 of 2025)

¶8

¶9

... Petitioner/ Accused

¶10

... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.14 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramasamy Meyyappan For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This matter is listed today under the caption "For Being Mentioned".

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Crl.O.P.No.16601 of 2025

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court has recorded the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner in para No.3 of the order dated 19.09.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.16601 of 2025 as that, the earlier criminal cases had reached its final stage of arguments, however the learned counsel for the petitioner has now stated that the same cases are pending for final stage of prosecution evidence.

¶20

Considering the submissions made, the para No.3 of the order dated 19.09.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.16601 of 2025 is modified as follows:

¶21

"The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that it is a false complaint and that the major allegation pertains to tampering with the evidence in the earlier criminal cases, which has now reached its final stage of prosecution evidence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner;"

¶22

4 . Registry is directed to carry out the aforesaid modification in the order dated 19.09.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.16601 of 2025 and issue fresh order copy.

08.10.2025

stn

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Crl.O.P.No.16601 of 2025

¶29