Disposed¶34

Prawin Krishna v. The State by, Inspector of Police

Madras HC23 Jun 2025CRL OP/14069/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, CRL OP No. 14069 of 2025, decided 23-06-2025 by G.K. Ilanthiraiyan J. Anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS 2023; apprehended offences under Sections 303 and 318 B.N.S.; Crime No. Not known of 2025; petition enquiry C.S.R.No.365 of 2025; directions to police to conclude enquiry in two weeks, register FIR or close enquiry; bar on coercive steps till enquiry completed; petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued: respondent police to conduct the enquiry and register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within two weeks; parties to cooperate with the enquiry; respondent police not to take any coercive steps to secure the accused till completion of the enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant. ¶34

Prawin Krishna Vs The State by, Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL OP NO. 14069 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 23-06-2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

CRL OP NO. 14069 of 2025

1.Prawin Krishna

2.Premavathy

3.M.Divyavarshini

Petitioner(s)

The State by, Inspector of Police T-13, Police Station, Kundrathur, Chennai-69.

¶12

(Crime No.NOT KNOWN OF 2025)

¶13

Respondent(s)

¶14

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.Not known of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

¶15

For Petitioner(s):

¶16

Mr.Asokaa M

¶17

For Respondent(s):

¶18

Mr.R.Vinothraja

¶19

Government Advocate (Criminal side)

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the

¶22

offences punishable under Sections 303 and 318 of B.N.S., in Crime No. Not known of

¶23

20225 seek anticipatory bail.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judishttps://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate

¶26

(Criminal side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petition enquiry

¶27

in C.S.R.No.365 of 2025 is pending against the petitioners.

¶28

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondent police is harassing the petitioners under the guise of enquiry.

¶29

Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent police is directed to conduct

¶30

enquiry and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioners, register the

¶31

F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of two weeks from today. The parties

¶32

are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of

¶33

enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.

¶34