Vignesh v. State rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.O.P.No.10619 of 2025 | Madras High Court | decision date 17.04.2025 | Sunder Mohan J. | Vignesh, petitioner/sole accused | anticipatory bail | Crime No.111 of 2025 | Chengam Police Station | Thiruvannamalai District | Section 438 Cr.P.C. | Section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 | dismissed as withdrawn | advocates: J.Pradeep for petitioner; S.Balaji, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), for respondent.
What did the court decide?
As the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and made an endorsement to that effect, the criminal original petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶20-21