Allowed

Saravanan v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC9 Jul 2025CRL MP(MD)/8651/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 528 BNSS seeking relaxation of bail conditions imposed in an earlier criminal original petition. The State confirmed regular compliance. The court relaxed the condition and directed the petitioner to report to police as and when required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9579 of 2025 dated 09.06.2025 relaxed; petitioner to report before respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

Saravanan Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL MP(MD). No.8651 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 09/07/2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI

¶7

CRL MP(MD). No.8651 of 2025 in CRL OP(MD). No.9579 of 2025

¶8

Saravanan, S/o.Vengatraman,

¶9

... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶10

¶11

The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Siruganur Police Station, Trichy District. (Crime No.113 of 2025). ... Respondent

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s.K.Sivabalan for M/s.Aran Legal Consultancy

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.528 of BNSS.

¶15

PRAYER :- To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner by this Court in its order, dated 09.06.2025, passed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9579 of 2025.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/3

¶18

CRL MP(MD). No.8651 of 2025

¶19

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶20

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9579 of 2025 dated 09.06.2025.

¶21

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions imposed by this court regularly and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶22

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has complied with the condition regularly.

¶23

Considering the nature of offence, the condition imposed by this Court, in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9579 of 2025 dated 09.06.2025, is relaxed and the petitioner shall

¶24

report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

Sd/-

09/07/2025

// True Copy //

/ /2025 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

gvn

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/3

¶32

CRL MP(MD). No.8651 of 2025

¶33

To :

¶34

The Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi.

¶35

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi, Trichy District.

¶36

The Inspector of Police, Siruganur Police Station, Trichy District.

¶37

The Inspector of Police, Thiruaiyur Police Station, Trichy District.

¶38

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶39

ORDER in CRL MP(MD). No.8651 of 2025 in CRL OP(MD). No.9579 of 2025 Dated : 09/07/2025

¶40

SB/23.07.2025 3P/6 C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

3/3

Saravanan v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saravanan v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guruvan Vs State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Sub Inspector of Police

Mahendran Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Satheesh Kumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Oddanchatram

Daison Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Koodankulam

Martin Sarath Vs The State of Tamilnadu

M.Gopalakrishnan Vs The State of Tamilnadu