Allowed

Jabeena Jasmeen v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC22 Jan 2025CRL MP(MD)/719/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition seeking relaxation of a condition imposed in an earlier order in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18197 of 2024. Mediation between A1 and the defacto complainant failed. The Court relaxed the condition and directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent police as and when required.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed in earlier order relaxed; petitioner to appear before respondent police as and when required.

Jabeena Jasmeen Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL MP(MD) NO. 719 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 24.01.2025

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

CRL MP(MD) NO. 719 of 2025 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.18197 of 2024

¶7

Jabeena Jasmeen

¶8

W/o.Mohaiyathen Basha, No.2, MGR 2nd Street, Panaiyur Kuppam, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600119.

¶9

Petitioner(s) Vs

¶10

The State of Tamil Nadu

¶11

Rep by The Inspector of Police, All women Police station, Oomachikulam, Madurai District.

¶12

Crime No. 5/2024 and another

¶13

Respondent(s)

¶14

For Petitioner(s):

¶15

M/s. Sheik Abdulla. A., Advocate Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate(crl.side) for R1

¶16

For Respondent(s):

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This petition has been filed for relaxation of the condition imposed on the

¶19

petitioner in the order dated 23.10.2024 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18197 of 2024.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

1/3

¶23

CRL MP(MD) NO. 719 of 2025

¶24

complying with the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18197 of

¶25

2024 on 23.10.2024, regularly and he prayed for relaxation of the said condition.

¶26

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that A1 and

¶27

the defacto complainant were referred to mediation centre, however, the mediation failed.

¶28

Taking into consideration, the facts and circumstances of the case, the

¶29

condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18197 of 2024 on 27.12.2024 is

¶30

relaxed and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and

when required.

sd/-

24/01/2025

/ TRUE COPY /

/02/2025

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶37

Madurai - 625 023.

¶38

SMA TO

¶39

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI.

¶40

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶41

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, OOMACHIKULAM,

¶42

MADURAI DISTRICT. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

2/3

¶44

CRL MP(MD) NO. 719 of 2025

¶45

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶46

+1 CC to M/s.A.SHEIK ABDULLA, Advocate ( SR-954[I] dated 28/01/2025 )

¶47

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.719 of 2025 IN CRL OP(MD) No.18197 of 2024 Date :24/01/2025

¶48

SA/SKN/SAR. /13.02.2025/3P/6C

¶49

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

3/3

Jabeena Jasmeen v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jabeena Jasmeen v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chrisbin Jeeva Vs The Inspector of Police

Selvam Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

C.Ananth Vs The state of Tamil Nadu

Mohammed Ansar Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Arafath Ali Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Manikandan Vs The State of Tamilnadu