Allowed

Mariappan, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC12 Jun 2025CRL MP(MD)/7106/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition sought relaxation of bail conditions previously imposed. The court noted the petitioner complied for 48 days and the nature of the offence permitted relaxation. The petition was allowed, changing the reporting requirement to police interrogation as needed.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5325 of 2025 is relaxed; petitioner shall report before respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

Mariappan, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL MP(MD). No.7106 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 12/06/2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI

¶7

CRL MP(MD). No.7106 of 2025 in CRL OP(MD). No.5325 of 2025

¶8

Mariappan, S/o.Karuppaiah, Indhar Colony, Nattarmangalam, Amathur Post, Virudhunagar District. ... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Amathur Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.54 of 2024). ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Baskar Mathuram Advocate.

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.528 of BNSS.

¶14

PRAYER :- To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner by this Court in its order, dated 21.03.2025, passed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5325 of 2025.

¶15

1/3

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶18

CRL MP(MD). No.7106 of 2025

¶19

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.5325 of 2025 dated 21.03.2025.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been

¶21

complying with the conditions imposed by this court regularly and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶22

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has complied with the conditions for 48 days.

¶23

Considering the nature of offence, the condition imposed on the petitioner by this Court, in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.5325 of 2025, dated 21.03.2025, is relaxed and the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for

¶24

interrogation. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶25

sd/12/06/2025

¶26

/ TRUE COPY /

¶27

/06/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

2/3

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRL MP(MD). No.7106 of 2025

¶31

GVN

¶32

¶33

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, VIRUDHUNAGAR.

¶34

2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶35

3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMATHUR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶36

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUT MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶37

+1. C.C. to S.BASKAR MATHURAM Advocate SR.No.6237 (I) DT.12/06/2025

¶38

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.7106 of 2025 IN CRL OP(MD) No.5325 of 2025 Date :12/06/2025

¶39

NM/19.06.2025 3P/6C

¶40

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶41

3/3

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mariappan, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mariappan, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saravanan Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Muniyandi Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Packiyanathan Alias Backiyanathan Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Shibin Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Chandran Vs The State of Tamilnadu

N.Balaji Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep by, Inspector of Police