Dismissed¶¶30

Sivakumar, v. Senthil Ananthi

Madras HC2 Dec 2025CRL MP(MD)/5389/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.5389 of 2025; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Mohammed Shaffiq, J.; 02.12.2025; Section 5 Limitation Act; condonation of 403 days delay; Criminal Revision Petition withdrawal endorsement; order dated 28.11.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.6509 of 2012 in M.C.No.11 of 2006; Judicial Magistrate Court, Aruppukottai; dismissed as withdrawn; Crl.RC(MD)SR.No.13698 of 2025 rejected.

What did the court decide?

In view of the Revision Petitioner's submissions and his endorsement of withdrawal in the supporting affidavit, with the Respondent's counsel raising no objection, the Criminal Revision Petition (and this delay-condonation Miscellaneous Petition) is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶¶30

Sivakumar, Vs Senthil Ananthi — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.5389 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 02.12.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.5389 of 2025 and Crl.RC.(MD)SR.No.13698 of 2025

Sivakumar

... Petitioner

vs.

1.Senthil Ananthi 2.Pradeepa ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 403 days for filing this Criminal Revision Petition in Crl.M.P.No.6509 of 2012 in M.C.No.11 of 2006, dated 28.11.2023 on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court, Aruppukottai.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sundarapandian For Respondent : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh *****

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.5389 of 2025

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

Heard Mr.S.Sundarapandian, learned Counsel for the Revision

¶18

Petitioner and Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh, learned Counsel for the Respondent.

¶19

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to

¶20

condone the delay of 403 days for filing this Criminal Revision Petition in Crl.M.P.No.6509 of 2012 in M.C.No.11 of 2006, dated 28.11.2023 on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court, Aruppukottai.

¶21

When the matter was taken up for hearing,

¶22

Mr.S.Sundarapandian, learned Counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner, submitted that the Revision Petitioner does not propose to press the Criminal Revision Petition and want to withdraw the same. He

¶23

has also made an endorsement to that effect in the affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Revision Petition.

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.5389 of 2025

¶27

4. Mr.Anand C.Rajesh, learned Counsel for the Respondent, stated

¶28

that he had no objection to the prayer made by the learned Counsel for

¶29

the Revision Petitioner.

¶30

In view of the submissions and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn . Consequently, Crl.RC(MD)SR.No. 13698 of 2025 is rejected .

¶31

Index :Yes / No 02.12.2025 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No Nsr

¶32

To:

¶33