Allowed

Subha v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC25 Feb 2025CRL MP(MD)/2416/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed to relax a condition imposed on the sole accused in a previous bail order. Upon receiving submissions from both counsel confirming the accused's regular compliance without violation, the Court allowed the petition and relaxed the specific condition.

What did the court decide?

Condition No. 7(b) imposed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.22367 of 2024 dated 18.12.2024 is fully relaxed; other conditions hold good.

Subha Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 25/02/2025

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL

¶6

CRL MP(MD). No.2416 of 2025 in CRL OP(MD). No.22367 of 2024

¶7

Subha ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Sengipatti Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No. 450 of 2024). ... Respondent/Complainant

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr. Dhilipan Pandian R L, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.S. Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶9

PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.439(1)b of Cr.P.C

¶10

PRAYER :-

¶11

To relax the condition imposed in Crl.OP(MD) No. 22367 of 2024 dt. 18.12.2024 on the file of this Honble High Court and thus render justice.

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

1/3

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

This Petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in the order passed

¶16

by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD). No.22367 of 2024, dated 18.12.2024.

¶17

Mr.R.L. Dhilipan Pandian, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and hence, he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶18

Mr.S.S.Manoj, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent-Police, submits that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly without any violation.

¶19

In view of the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate

¶20

(Crl. Side), this Court is inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in the said Criminal Original Petition.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

2/3

¶23

Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed and the

¶24

condition No.7(b) imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD). No. 22367 of 2024, dated

¶25

18.12.2024 is hereby fully relaxed. The other conditions shall hold good.

Sd/-

25/02/2025

/ TRUE COPY /

/03/2025

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶31

trp TO

¶32

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III THANJAVUR, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

¶33

2 DO-THROUGH-THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

¶34

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SENGIPATTI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

¶35

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶36

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN

¶37

CRL MP(MD) No.2416 of 2025 IN CRL OP(MD) No.22367 of 2024 Date :25/02/2025

¶38

ES/SKN/SAR /04.03.2025/3P/5C

¶39

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 17/07/2023.

¶40

3/3

Subha v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subha v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Premnath Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Minnalkodi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Balamurugan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Shyju Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Murugapandiyan Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Aravinth Vs The State of TamilNadu