Allowed

Pooma @ Boovammal v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sindupatti

Madras HC26 Nov 2025CRL MP(MD)/18378/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 528 BNSS to relax a condition imposed in an earlier criminal original petition. Both sides confirmed compliance; the court relaxed the condition and permitted reporting before the trial court only as and when required.

What did the court decide?

Condition in Crl.OP(MD).No.19350 of 2025 dated 04.11.2025 relaxed; petitioner to report before trial court as and when required.

Pooma @ Boovammal Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of… — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL.MP(MD).No.18378 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD).No.19350 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 26.11.2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶7

CRL.MP(MD).No.18378 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD). No.19350 of 2025

¶8

Pooma @ Boovammal ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Sindhupatti Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.198 of 2021) ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER :- Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to relax the condition imposed against the petitioner made in Crl.OP(MD).No.19350 of 2025 dated 04.11.2025 and to pass such other reliefs.

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

CRL.MP(MD).No.18378 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD).No.19350 of 2025

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah For Respondent : M/s.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶16

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶17

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.OP(MD).No.19350 of 2025 dated 04.11.2025.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court regularly and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶19

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶20

Considering the nature of offence, the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.OP(MD).No.19350 of 2025 dated 04.11.2025, is relaxed and the petitioner shall report before the trial Court as and when required.

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

CRL.MP(MD).No.18378 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD).No.19350 of 2025

¶24

Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶25

(S S Y J) 26.11.2025

¶26

msrm

¶27

¶28

The Special Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai.

¶29

The Inspector of Police, Sindhupatti Police Station, Madurai District.

¶30

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶31

3/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

CRL.MP(MD).No.18378 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD).No.19350 of 2025

¶34

S.SRIMATHY,J

¶35

msrm

¶36

ORDER in CRL.MP(MD). No.18378 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD). No.19350 of 2025

¶37

Date : 26.11.2025

¶38

4/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Pooma @ Boovammal v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sindupatti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pooma @ Boovammal v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sindupatti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seethalakshmi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps-Palayamkottai

Suresh Kannan @ Nettur Kannan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

R. Manikandan Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Rajendran Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Aravindkumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Ettayapuram

Esakkumuthu Vs The State of Tamil Nadu