Allowed

Vignesh v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thalaiyuthu

Madras HC20 Nov 2025CRL MP(MD)/17679/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to relax a condition imposed in an earlier criminal original petition. Both sides noted the petitioner had been complying with the condition regularly; the court relaxed it and directed him to report to police as and when required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed earlier relaxed; petitioner to report before respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

Vignesh Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police… — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL.MP(MD).No.17679 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD).No.17747 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 20.11.2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶7

CRL.MP(MD) No.17679 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD) No.17747 of 2025

¶8

Vignesh ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The State of Tamilnadu, Rep By Inspector of Police, Thalaiyuthu Police Station Tirunelveli District Crime No.534/2025 ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER :- Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner by this Court in Crl.OP(MD)No. 17747 of 2025 dated 15.10.2025.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Boopathi

¶13

For Respondent : Mrs.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRL.MP(MD).No.17679 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD).No.17747 of 2025

¶17

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶18

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.OP(MD).No.17747 of 2025 dated 15.10.2025.

¶19

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court regularly and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶20

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶21

Considering the nature of offence, the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.OP(MD).No.17747 of 2025 dated 15.10.2025, is relaxed and the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶22

(S S Y J) 20.11.2025

¶23

msrm

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

CRL.MP(MD).No.17679 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD).No.17747 of 2025

¶27

¶28

The Inspector of Police, Thalaiyuthu Police Station Tirunelveli District

¶29

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

CRL.MP(MD).No.17679 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD).No.17747 of 2025

¶33

S.SRIMATHY,J

¶34

msrm

¶35

ORDER in CRL.MP(MD). No.17679 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD). No.17747 of 2025

¶36

Date : 20.11.2025

¶37

4/4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Vignesh v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thalaiyuthu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vignesh v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thalaiyuthu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

William Baulraj Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by

Nithishwaran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thiruvadanai

Palani, Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Town East

Muthugurunathamani Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Rajapalayam South

Saravanakumar @ Rajendran Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Jegan Jeyasurya Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Assistant conservator of Forest