Ramalakshmi v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition to implead the defacto complainant in a suspension of sentence petition was not pressed by counsel and was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14533 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.1066 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15-10-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
CRL MP(MD) No.14533 of 2025 in
CRL A(MD) No.1066 of 2025
Ramalakshmi
Petitioner/ Appellant/ Accused No.2
Vs
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by, The Inspector of Police, Thenkarai Police Station, Madurai.
Respondent/ Respondent/ Complainant
2.B.Prabhakaran
Proposed Respondent No.2/ Defacto complainant
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying to implead the proposed respondent in the suspension of sentence petition in Crl.M.P.(MD)No.13875 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.1066 of 2025.
1/2
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.14533 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD)No.1066 of 2025
For Petitioner: Mr.S.Arokia Selva Ramesh, Advocate
For Respondents: Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh,
Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner would submit that he is not pressing this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
petitioner, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
15-10-2025
CSM
To
2/2
Ramalakshmi
The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by, The Inspector of Police, Thenkarai Police Station, Madurai
B.Prabhakaran
K.Murali Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court