Disposed

K.Harihara Suntharan v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC3 Jan 2025CRL MP(MD)/14329/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought dispensation of personal appearance before the trial court in a pending quash petition. The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, allowed the miscellaneous petition and dispensed with the petitioner's personal appearance before the trial court pending disposal of the quashing proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of petitioner before trial court in C.C.No.1483/2023 dispensed with.

K.Harihara Suntharan Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL MP(MD) No.14329 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Third day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Five

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.14329 of 2024 in CRL OP(MD) No.22853 of 2024

¶7

K.HARIHARA SUNTHARAN

¶8

... Petitioner / Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1 THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.11 OF 2023.

¶11

2 VINEKA

¶12

... Respondents / Respondents

¶13

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial court in C.C.No. 1483/2023 dt. 02.06.2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Thoothukudi pending disposal of the above Crl.O.P.

¶14

Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 22853/ 2024 :

¶15

To call for the records relating to the Final Report in C.C.No.1483/023 dt. 02.06.2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No. IV, Thoothukudi and quash the same as illegal and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/3

¶18

CRL MP(MD) No.14329 of 2024

¶19

Order : This Criminal Miscellaneous petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s.A. JOSEPH JERRY, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/s.A.THIRUVADI KUMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶20

The personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed with.

¶21

sd/03/01/2025

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

/ 01 /2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. I / II / III / IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

RMK

¶25

¶26

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO. IV, THOOTHUKUDI

¶27

2.DO-THROUGH

¶28

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶29

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶30

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/3

¶32

CRL MP(MD) No.14329 of 2024

¶33

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.14329 of 2024 in CRL OP(MD) No.22853 of 2024 Date :03/01/2025

¶34

PSP/ VR /SAR /13.01.2025/ 3P/ 5C

¶35

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/3

K.Harihara Suntharan v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Harihara Suntharan v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kannamani Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Samuel George Kalai Arasar Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Vr. Meiyappan Vs The Superintendent of Police

R.Rajagopal Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Ramkumar Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Rajendran Vs The State of Tamilnadu