Allowed¶17

S.Sritharanswamiji v. R.Somasundram

Madras HC28 Aug 2025CRL MP(MD)/11574/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Time extension; 20 percent deposit before Judicial Magistrate No.I Fast Track Court Madurai; suspension of sentence condition; S. 528 BNSS petition; CRL MP(MD) 11574 of 2025 in Crl.RC(MD) 1279 of 2023; Crl.A. 99 of 2023; time extended till 11.09.2025; compliance posted 12.09.2025; Madurai Bench, Madras High Court; L. Victoria Gowri J.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time till 11.09.2025 to deposit 20 percent of the money before the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,(Fast Track Court), Madurai; the matter is posted on 12.09.2025 for compliance. ¶17

S.Sritharanswamiji Vs R.Somasundram — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

Criminal Jurisdiction

¶3

Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of August Two Thousand and Twenty Five

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

CRL MP(MD). No.11574 of 2025 in Crl.R.C(MD)No.1279 of 2023

¶7

S.Sritharan Swamiji ... Petitioner / Petitioner

¶8

¶9

R.Somasundram ... Respondent / Respondent

¶10

Prayer :-

¶11

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under section 528 of BNSS to extent the three days time granted in Crl.MP.(MD)No.3520 of 2024 in Crl.RC.(MD)No.1279 of 2023 order dated 21.03.2024 in Crl.A.No.99 of 2023 to deposit 20 percent of the money before the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,(Fast Track Court), Madurai to execute the bail bonds.

¶12

Prayer in CRL RC(MD). 1279/ 2023 :

¶13

Criminal Revision Case is filed under section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.p.c., to take this revision petition on the file and call for the records from the lower appellate court and allowed the revision petition by setting aside the 1st condition of the order, imposed for suspension of sentence, to deposit 20 percent of the compensation amount within a month,dated.6/10/23 in Cr.M.P.No.5724 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.99 of 2023, on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Madurai.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

ORDER:- This Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. S. Senthil Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner, this Court made the following order:

¶16

'This petition has been filed to extend the three days time granted in Crl.MP. (MD)No.3520 of 2024 in Crl.RC.(MD)No.1279 of 2023 order dated 21.03.2024 in Crl.A.No.99 of 2023 to deposit 20 percent of the money before the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,(Fast Track Court), Madurai.

¶17

Time is extended till 11.09.2025 to comply the order. Accordingly, this petition is ordered.

¶18

Post the matter on 12.09.2025, for compliance.'

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy //

¶21

/ /2025 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS - I/II/III/IV)

¶22

¶23

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, (Fast Track Court), Madurai.

¶24

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Madurai.

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Copy to:

¶27

The Section Officer, Criminal Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶28

ORDER DATED : 28/08/2025 HEARING DATE : 12/09/2025 ========================== ORDER ========================== CRL MP(MD). No.11574 of 2025 in Crl.R.C(MD)No.1279 of 2023

¶29

Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

¶30

TS (04/09/2025) 3P/4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Sritharanswamiji v. R.Somasundram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sritharanswamiji v. R.Somasundram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.R Prem Chandar Vs Manivannan

A.Chandran Vs Kumar

S. Thiruvenkataramanujam Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police

P. Juliet Saral CHrISTY Vs R. Loganathan

M.S. Sasikala Vs The District Revenue Officer

R.K.Nachammal Vs The Inspector of police